BrotherMen

month

June 2012

40 posts

neekcooper:

I’m done with the ‘Wishing your mom ‘Happy Fathers Day’ debate. I shouldn’t have  brought it up. However, I do stand strongly on my opinions on Fathers Day and that won’t change much.

*shrug*

Ya’ll have a good Sunday. Also, the NBA Finals Game 3 is today and I will be at work. SMH. That fucking sucks buffalo dick.

Jun 17, 20121 note
I know that we Black Men are some prideful motherfuckers. We don't like people knowing that we hurt, we cry, we love and we want to be happy...all that mushy shit, right?

thehuskybro:

Hell, I didn’t want to write this, for people to know that I am a bastard and that my father didn’t, for whatever reasons, didn’t want to meet me or have anything to do with me.  Fearing that if everyone knew that, they would look at me as if I was weak.

Then I think, “You are a Black Man in America, son…you got 999 problems and being looked upon as weak is only one”

Sorry Jay-Z.

image

People are going to think what they about you, that shouldn’t prevent you doing what you need to do or living the way that you choose to live. 

But, when it comes to your kids, you gotta throw all that pride, all that “I’m a man” shit, all that “I can’t stand that bitch”, whatever your hang up is, toss it out the door.  

They’re your children(s) and that trumps everything.

Bottom line. 

Jun 17, 201215 notes
#father's day
Jun 17, 201237 notes
#father's day
Rodney King Dead at 47 | TMZ.com → tmz.com

thehuskybro:

Rodney King — the man who was at the center of the infamous Los Angeles riots — was found dead this morning. He was 47.

According to our sources, King’s fiancée found him dead at the bottom of a pool.

Jun 17, 201212 notes
Its Fathers Day on the east coast

neekcooper:

chanceofreign:

isra-bakar:

chanceofreign:

neekcooper:

And people are wishing mothers ‘Happy Fathers Day’

Mothers Day was in May. SMH. I don’t like it when people say ‘Happy Fathers Day’ to mothers. I’m sorry. I hate it.

image

a post i agree 100% with and an idris elba gif…perfection.

well fuck you! Who asked you? I can choose to wish my mother, happy mothers day and happy fathers day if i damn well wanna. Fatherhood is a role not a gendered occupation.

chill. as someone with a shitty biological dad, i can understand the reason behind saying it, but plain and simple my mom IS NOT my father. Shes awesome, and i could not ask for a better woman and mother, however, no amount of care, awesomeness, love or support from her makes up for the lack of my biological father. hell even my stepdad, who is awesome, doesnt make up for that.

No doubt ya mom is great. But shes not your father. She cant be. Suppress it if you want, but it will come out…been there done that.

Its just my personal opinion. I don’t like it. Mothers Day is in May. Its time to honor the great fathers of the world. No sidejokes. No BS. In addition to, honoring the father-like figures in your life. If you want to wish your mother ‘Happy Fathers Day’ that’s you. Me? I will not. I don’t like it.

Also, I know plenty of women that don’t like being wished ‘Happy Fathers Day’ because they are mothers and don’t see the point of it. 

Jun 17, 201232 notes
#father's day
Jun 15, 201245 notes
#fathers #family #single dads #love
Neek The Bacon: Dave Chappelle Was Here In Memphis → neekcooper.tumblr.com

neekcooper:

And I went to see him.

He’s still a funny guy. He has changed from what he “used to be” to now.

(1) He has bigger arms. (2) He doesn’t smoke weed anymore but he does smoke plenty of cigarettes. He smoked at least 4 on the stage. (3) He doesn’t do much of the stuff from the Chappelle Show. Which…

Jun 13, 20125 notes
Jun 12, 20127 notes
Jun 11, 201266 notes
When the Church Fails Its Women: 7 Truths We Need to Tell About Creflo Dollar, Black Daughters and Violence → crunkfeministcollective.wordpress.com

amarishosha:

crunkfeministcollective:

Yesterday, for the first time in my life, I walked out of church in the middle of service. I grew up in church; my stepfather of 15 years is a pastor; as recently as 2009, I led a ministry team  at one of Atlanta’s Baptist megachurches. Thus, my choice to get up and walk out while the pastor was speaking defied every notion of decorum I have ever been taught.

Image from madamenoire.com

But when he stood to express his unequivocal support for Atlanta megachurch pastor Creflo Dollar who was arrested late last week for committing simple battery and cruelty to a child on his fifteen year old daughter, I had to go. 

I have struggled in recent years to reconcile my long-standing faith, to my relatively more recent feminist commitments. And it is precisely because of the Black Church’s continued willingness to advocate problematic, violent, hierarchical stances against women and gay people that I continue to struggle.

According to the police report, Dollar told his daughter  she couldn’t go to a party due to bad grades.  From there the situation got real ugly. His daughter left the room, went into the kitchen and started crying. Dollar followed her, asked why she was crying, and when she indicated that she didn’t want to talk to him, she says that he  “then charged her, put his hands around her throat and began to choke her, slammed her to the ground and began to punch her,  and took off his shoe and started whooping her with it.” The victim’s 19 year old sister, who witnessed the altercation, backed up her sister’s story. Dollar, himself, admitted only to using a shoe.

In classic fashion, Dollar denied everything yesterday, as he entered his sanctuary to a standing ovation. “She was not choked. She was not punched….I should never have been arrested.” Elsewhere he said, “All is well in the Dollar household.”

Apparently, his daughters are bald-faced liars. Both of them. And apparently, they resent him so much that they would concoct this magnificently violent tale in order to have him arrested. If he thinks all is well, clearly he isn’t well.

So now let’s entertain the notion that his daughters are telling the truth or at least some truth.

What would it look like for our faith communities to be places where Black girls could testify about the violence they experience from the men in our communities and be believed? 

What would it look like for Black women, the primary attendants and financial supporters of the Black Church, to demand accountability from the overwhelmingly male leadership in our pulpits?

The most troubling thing about Creflo’s statement was the overwhelming amount of support from his female parishioners. I can’t help but notice the admixture of fear and disappointment on the fifteen year old girls face in the above video (1:19) as her mother actively sides with Creflo for the cameras. 

What would it mean for us to recognize that when we refuse to believe the testimony of other Black women and girls, it makes our own witness “for the Lord,” before the law, and before anyone else we need to believe us less credible?

Yet, I witnessed Black women coming out in full support of the “man of God” in droves because…

“We weren’t there.”

“We don’t know what happened in that house…”

“We don’t know what she did or said to provoke him…”

[What is this? Chris Brown and RiRi 2.0? (Let me leave that alone.)]

“If she swung on him first (as some news outlets reported), then she deserved it…” {And for the record, the police report in no way indicates any such thing. Even Creflo doesn’t say she swung on him.}

“If you’ve ever raised a teenager, you know how they can be…”

“He has the right to discipline his children.”

For the record, we never know the whole story about anything, if it didn’t happen to us. That doesn’t prevent us from making reasonable judgments based on the evidence. Christians use the same type of reason to profess our faith in a God-man, who was born from a virgin, crucified on a cross and Resurrected on the 3rd day. And we believe in his Resurrection, primarily on the basis of the initial testimony of some women who Jesus’ male followers weren’t trying to hear (Mark 16: 1-11). So in my view, if we refuse to believe Black girls when they testify about their experiences, we call the basis of our own witness and our own faith into question. Jesus prioritized listening to women, even when his disciples said they were being a nuisance.

Why I wonder are Black women so willing, so ready to co-sign theologies that literally support us getting our asses kicked in our own homes? 

Why have we bought into the primary premise of white supremacy, that the most effective way to establish authority is through violence? Surely, this situation teaches us that the only thing that kind of parenting does is breed the kind of resentment and contempt that will have your children calling the cops on you at 1 in the morning.

Why is it so hard for us to take a stand against Black men and tell them that there is never a reason to put their hands on us in a violent fashion? Not when homicide is the top killer of Black women and girls ages 15-24.

Frankly, we need to “radically rethink” our understandings of authority, love, violence, and respect in the Black Church.  Black folks love to say, Tell the Truth, and Shame the Devil. Well here are seven truths we need to tell.

1.)   Sisters have the power to change this thing. The Black Church is one of the few places where we do have this kind of power. And the tide won’t turn, until Black women get fed up and then start to stand up, start walking out, and start taking our money with us.

2.)  Children are not our property. It is not their job to confer upon us the worth and dignity denied to us by others. We do not get to violently beat them into submission, supported by terrible “spare the rod” theologies. Everyone wants children to obey, but what do we do with Ephesians 6:1-4 which clearly, after telling children to honor their parents, admonishes fathers not to “provoke children to wrath.” Wonder why that’s in there?

3.)  Discipline is not synonymous with punishment or spanking. It was in church that I learned that discipline and disciple share the same root word. To disciple means to train up (usually in the ways of Jesus.) Aren’t there more creative and effective ways to parent? Spanking is the easy-out option. It is the option that packs the “literal” biggest punch, requires the least amount of thought, and is designed to quickly redirect undesirable behaviors. But it is largely ineffective, and rarely about actual discipline. Spanking is used to communicate anger to a child for doing something wrong. They are used to remind the child who’s boss. And the boss is the person who gets to mete out violence when the rules don’t get followed. Interestingly enough, in the Black Church, I think far too many of us understand God in these exact same terms –as the strict disciplinarian, who polices all our actions, ever ready to issue cosmic butt whoopings when we don’t fall into line. Thank God for delivering me from such thinking.

4.)  Domestic violence is not discipline. And this was domestic violence. And I find it hard to believe that a man who will beat the shit out of his own daughter, who feels biblically justified in doing so, wouldn’t beat the shit out of her mother, too. Not levying any accusations here, but I think it’s a question worth raising. Read this Black girl’s testimony and see how true it rings. 

5.)   Just because your parents whooped you, and you “turned out fine,” doesn’t mean the whoopings are the cause of it. Black folks are overcomers by copious circumstance. But that doesn’t mean we have to keep recreating negative circumstances for our children and calling them right and good. I had a racist sixth grade teacher who made me cry every day. I still made excellent grades and remained undeterred. If I have children, I will not seek out a racist teacher for them, celebrate their ability to excel despite it, and then claim that they excelled because of it. That is pathological.

6.)    The Black Church can’t have it both ways. If Black fathers set the moral tone for how men will treat their (presumably hetero) daughters, then Black folks cannot continue to insist that a father’s punches thrown in anger are wholly distinct from a partner’s punches thrown in anger. I’ve always found it interesting, that when we talk about the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, no one wants to critique Lot, nephew of Abraham, for tossing his daughters out the door to be raped by the men of the city. No one makes the connection that a few verses over these same two daughters get Lot drunk, sleep with and get pregnant by him, and become the mothers of tribes that create all manner of havoc for the Israelites. We are so invested in sic’ing this text on gay people like rabid dogs, that we miss it’s more obvious invitations to consider the ways in which men of God–and the Bible calls Lot “righteous”–have a long tradition of subordinating the well-being of the women in their lives to other goals that seem to be more morally significant, those aims namely being homophobia and patriarchy. But Genesis seems to insist that a father’s choice to subject his daughters to violence can cause those daughters to both resent and actively seek to humiliate their father. (Genesis 19)

7.)   Our theology will kill us if we let it.  But Jesus already died, and I refuse to let the Black Church turn me into a martyr for its causes. I refuse to stand by while Black men (and women) use bad theology about headship and Black women and men use bad theology about “sparing the rod” to heap indignities on women and children in the name of God.  Our blind investment in patriarchy, and the kind of hierarchy it promotes in churches and families is not healthy for a people who continue to find themselves on the bottom of every social hierarchy that exists. In my faith communities, being a feminist makes me suspect. But to them I say,  Jesus was a feminist. In my feminist communities, being a Christian often makes me suspect. And to them I say the same thing, Jesus was a feminist. So I am going to unapologetically let my faith and my feminism inform one another. (And keep reading great blog series like this one to help me out on rough days.) It is because I believe in Jesus and feminism, that  I don’t tolerate violence against women in any form from the men in my life, and I for damn sure, am not gonna sit up and hear violent ish coming at me from the pulpit. Black women have to become as serious about demanding that our churches are spaces where we can tell our testimonies about the violence done to us and be believed. I am determined to have a theology that is truly liberatory, one centered on grace, healing and abundant life. And if I have to raise hell and disrespect a few pulpits to get it, so be it. 


all of the applause for this article. i didn’t grow up christian but some of the same misogynistic and violent behaviors framed my childhood. 

Jun 11, 2012369 notes
Jun 11, 20121,206 notes
“So I say, you know, I say [Nicole Beharie] could be Brandon’s [Michael Fassbender] girlfriend, but what was interesting about it was the objections about it. People say, “Oh, that wouldn’t happen. That wouldn’t exist.” What? I don’t exist? It was a very odd thing, having these conversations about a love interest that was a black woman with Brandon. It was interesting, that… Also, what fascinates me is that you have lots of American filmmakers, white filmmakers, who have never, ever cast a black person, ever in their movies, and they’ve made quite a lot of movies. So it’s: how can you avoid that? It’s kinda weird. It’s almost like, you know, walking around with a blindfold on. And how can you make movies in this country, consistently make movies, and not cast black characters in the main leads?” —

Steve McQueen, award-winning director of Shame, on people’s reaction to the casting of a black woman, Nicole Beharie, as the lead (white) character’s love interest (via fuckyeahwhitetv)

I love everything about this quote except him equating his invisibility with hers because it’s not the same. Not saying his is any less significant, but making the black female the “love object” in a mixed cast ensemble isn’t the same as placing a black man in the same position. Chiwetel, Idris, Denzel, Will, Jesse, have been that multiple times. Not many black actresses can say the same.  

(via agent355)

I didn’t like him equating his invisibility with hers either. But I’m kind of obsessed with this particular quote (and the context in which he said it) that I’ve been wondering if that part isn’t about the interracial relationship so much as the visibility. So it’s about the end of the quote (where are the Black people in these movies), not so much where are the interracial relationships. 

(via femmenoire)

I think the first half and the second half of this quote are separate things though, he’s not saying producers wouldn’t have cast her in the movie, but casting her in that specific part was unrealistic to some people. He’s talking about the idea Nicole being wanted emotionally by a man like Brandon and equating that with his blackness, which just doesn’t work for me. Equating it with the resistance to casting black actors in movies period, and especially as leads does work for me though. 

(via agent355)

No I understand what you’re saying. I agree. I’m just asking if that bit isn’t connected to the latter part because of the convoluted way in which he speaks. He tends to talk around things that’s hard for me to follow so I’ve been wondering at that injection for a while. 

(via femmenoire)

Even when a black man is defending a sista, he is somehow still wrong

Jun 10, 2012257 notes
Jun 09, 20126 notes
Jun 09, 201263 notes
I live in a country where the banks would rather tear down a million foreclosed homes than let one homeless person live in one of them...

thehuskybro:

image

How come we’re not mad about that?

Jun 09, 201226 notes
Hey Reality TV Show Women, Especially You All In Atlanta...

gabrielleunionisfromnebraska:

you do realize that this dude

image

ain’t laughing with you, right?  He’s laughing at you…all the way to the bank

Jun 09, 201213 notes
Tumblr's response to domestic violence
  • Chris Brown: OMG WHAT A FUCKING ASSHOLE HOW DARE HE BE FAMOUS WHAT A DICK.
  • Michael Fassbender: *cricket*...*cricket*...
  • Sean Pean: *cricket*... *cricket*...
  • Gary Oldman: *cricket*... *cricket*...
  • Charlie Sheen: *cricket*... *cricket*...
  • Matthew Fox: *cricket*... *cricket*...
  • Sean Connery: *cricket*... *cricket*...
  • David Hasselhoff: *cricket*... *cricket*...
  • Mel Gibson: *cricket*... *cricket*...
  • Christian Slater: *cricket*... *cricket*...
  • Bill Murray: *cricket*... *cricket*...
  • Gary Busey: *cricket*... *cricket*...
Jun 07, 20125,960 notes
Django is off the chain

thehuskybro:

image

Oy vey.

Yeah, it’s going to be a long 6 months before this movie hits the theaters.

Jun 06, 20127 notes
#django unchained
I'm stripping myself of the anti Chris Brown crowd.

eastafrodite:

eastafrodite:

Today was the last straw with this bullshit that The Daily What put out, because there’s something else at play that I can’t get with.

People are more concerned with a political or sociological agenda than they are with the actual victim.

First, let’s get one silly notion out of the way. Rihanna owes you nothing. How self-centered of you to even assume so. All she owes is herself peace of mind. She’s the victim and she gets to rationalize her trauma anyway she pleases. If it means following Chris Brown on Twitter, so be it. If it means collaborating with him on a song, then so be it. You don’t need to understand it, all you’re required to do is respect it.

Secondly and this is what disgusts me the most of these anti Chris Brown people. If you are going to consciously distribute pictures of her battered face and copies of the police report, do us all the favor and admit you do not give a fuck about Rihanna. This is only a publicity stunt for you and your blog, because she has stated on multiple accounts how embarrassing those photos are to her. We’ve seen the pictures and read the account, you don’t need to rehash what’s already been told for the past three years. If your motive is more focused on demoralizing Brown than respecting Rihanna’s wishes, you are disingenuous as fuck and taking advantage of a vulnerable situation for your underhanded cause.

Lastly, if you’re going to focus on Chris Brown, please be sure to do the same when a celebrity (who’s not Black) does the same shit. I cannot recall how many times I’ve talked to feminists who will swear Chris Brown is the spawn of the devil, but act completely oblivious about the likes of Eminem, Charlie Sheen, Mel Gibson and their similar actions. The irony of all this is how content Rihanna has become with the situation, while the victims of the other White men get virtually no attention, although they’re vocal about their experiences. If you’re satisfied with degrading a young Black man for his abusive ways, while glancing over the older White men, you need to take a long, hard look at your motives and what you’re really trying to accomplish. You’re just playing into subtle racism by suggesting Black men are more violent and hypermasculine. This is similar to the fight on misogyny in Hip-Hop, while Country, Rock and Pop are overlooked.

Reblogging for reasons, mainly this.

Jun 04, 2012612 notes
Jun 02, 2012298,317 notes
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January 7
  • February 2
  • March
  • April 21
  • May 17
  • June 10
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 15
  • February 16
  • March 37
  • April 34
  • May 37
  • June 40
  • July 40
  • August 8
  • September 3
  • October 1
  • November
  • December 8
2010 2011 2012
  • January 67
  • February 9
  • March 48
  • April 52
  • May 74
  • June 98
  • July 36
  • August 48
  • September 54
  • October 74
  • November 65
  • December 35
2010 2011
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November 14
  • December 28